Lavoie Must Go
Albert Lavoie, Saskatchewan’s beastial judge, must be deposed. He must lose his job and suffer as painful a humiliation and punishment more severe than that he gave hordes of people before his bench. He cannot control himself. His judgements are absurd and illegal. His punishments cruel, unusual and extreme. He foams at the mouth and gets seizures of ecstasy from power. He is a fanatical tyrant, a delusional madman that perhaps bribed, bullied and defrauded his way to the bench. He is arrogant, extreme, and incapable of knowing anything. He should be on the streets rather than take up any low profession, for it would insult those who work such a profession! He should be naked for persecution, forced to strip and fuck for pocket change before having his stomach stripped open and be burned alive by a gang of wrongfully accused persons gone insane from his extremism and abuse. He is intolerant of criticism, and has no other feelings than psychotic rage. He is a criminal, for criminals break laws and he’s broken laws, thus a criminal worthy of punishment worse than what the darkest recesses of a cannibalistic mind could spark. He’s protected by the government, and the only other way can be expelled is to shoot the bastard. Just because he’s a judge, it doesn’t justify any of the wrongdoing he’s done. He deserves no protection, for it feeds his sense of entitlement and privilege, and upon him should come down with crushing ferocity the iron hands of the very responsibility and duty judges have for so long emptily preached about.
How can this be accomplished, it will be asked. Petition, write to the Premier, your MLA, the Judicial Council… or form a group, seize him from his bench, or home, drag him into an abandoned building, hold a kangaroo court, then lynch the son-of-a-whore when all else fails.
“Justice is not a cloistered virtue; she must be allowed to suffer scrutiny and respectful, even though outspoken, comments by ordinary men – (Lord Atkin in Ambard v. Attorney-General). It is prima face legitimate to criticize a judge’s conduct in a particular case or to criticize any particular decision or series of decisions given by the courts id done without casting any aspersions on the motives of the judge or court, and without abuse. The courts are not above criticism.” (Regina v Glen Dalk; CC/R/181)
